Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole scam agenda CAMPAIGN UPDATES on twitter.com/khoodeelaar

http://twitter.com/khoodeelaar

1830 Hrs GMT Wed 5 April 2006

http://www.khoodeelaar.com
Edition updated at 1830 Hrs GMT / 1930 Hrs UK time Wednesday 5 April 2006
KHOODEELAAR!
The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole-tunnel ‘project, scheme, plan’ Bill [that is ‘the Crossrail Bill’ in the UK House of Commons – in April 2006]
Legal Disclaimer published at the end of this web page Tuesday 4 April 2006
This Khoodeelaardotcom and the khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole organisation based in London East One, UK constitute the unique source of original and exclusive materials on the contents of the CrossRail hole Bill and on the social, economic, political and cultural implications of that crass Crossrail hole Bill on the people affected by the powers being sought through that Crossrail Bill.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
is viewable at the bottom of this edition


Khoodeelaar! Online 2006
Published by CBRUK from London UK
Editor: Muhammad Haque
Legal affairs: Lawcompliance Lawcompliance@hotmail.co.uk
Constitutional matters:
Lawmedia lawmedia@hotmail.com
Khoodeelaar Media khoodeelaartyv@yahoo.co.uk
Khoodeelaar No to Crossrail hole Action


Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006
Councillor-candidates-Commentary by
Muhammad Haque
Brick Lane London E1 Area
1830 Hrs GMT / 1930 Hrs UK time Wednesday 5 April 2006



Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane London E1 area

Just how overwhelmingly votes-centred are your ‘candidates’!
The Khoodeelaar! task ahead in the battle to stop the CrossRail hole attacks on the community


It looks very likely that the scheduled 4 May 2006 council elections may not produce a Tower Hamlets Council that we the community of people in the Borough can trust and respect as our reliable, dependable council ready to stand up for us.

How is that evident?

Well, the candidates have vanished!

They are right here somewhere in the community. But they are mighty nervous. They are very very touchy. And secretive.

Q: How so?

Answer: Like they have things to hide!

Or some things to hide!

Q: Like they don’t have the time to talk! Not at any length anyway.

And this is eerily reminiscent of another time.

Q: What sort of time is that?

The time before the Khoodeelaar! campaign against CrossRail hole!

When the councillors in this area were most rel7ycant to be seen talking to people as ordinary mortals.

Q: What sort of things did councillors do to show they didn’t have time to talk to people?

They would make excuses.

Q: Like what?

They would raise their mobile phones to the levels of their shoulders, press the mobiles on their bodies somewhere so tightly that an onlooker would form the impression that they were in fact talking to someone on a very important matter of state!

Q: And did the people let them do that and get away with that sort of tactic?

Of course they did. Councillors are important people.

PART 2

The Khoodeelaar! Examination of the political role played by Lib Dem ‘Opposition Group’ leader Janet Ludlow


Coming here in the next 24 hours


From the previous edition:

Campaign breaking news


George Galloway’s RESPECT backs Khoodeelaar! Statement on Michael Keith’s Crossrail-hole-role!


RESPECT spokesperson Rob Hoveman confirmed that the Khoodeelaar construction of Michael Keith’s role is a better one than the one published on the Socialist Workers party web site today.

This is what Khoodeelaar has written today on the ongoing campaign against Crassrail and against the CrossRail-hole-pusher Michael Keith

Michael Keith should be described as having been involved in ‘misrepresenting the facts to the community generally and to the campaigners in the area against the CrossRail hole plan which Michael Keith himself had been pushing for and is still pushing for [even after the U-turn announced by Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006]….”


This comes in a comment sent to Khoodeelaaronline by George Galloway’s RESPECT staff member Rob Hoveman this afternoon.

The comment concerns a formulation that Khoodeelaar online had constructed following the appearance on the Socialist Workers party website of a RESPECT local election round up. In that round up, the Socialist Workers party web site had referred to the Crossrail hole and by implication was also referring to the latest stunt staged by Tower Hamlets council Crossrail-hole-pushing clique leader Michael Keith.

This is how the Socialist Workers Party web site reported Michael Keith’s behaviour concerned:

“Already, Labour has been forced to respond to the challenge. After years of supporting Crossrail—a transport scheme that would devastate the Brick Lane area and a local park—council leader Michael Keith last week announced a complete U-turn.”


After reading this, the khoodeelaaronline Editor contacted RESPECT coalition and sought a comment.

This is how the relevant exchanges went :
“We [Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole…] consider the piece that has been published in the SOCIALIST Workers web site as typically unrecognising of the local community as well as unjustifiably unrecognising of Khoodeelaar!.

We know that formally, the SOCIALIST WORKER web site is not the responsibility of the RESPECT Coalition.

We are therefore NOT seeking any explanation about that.

We are asking for a statement from RESPECT' to the following question:
Do you agree with Khoodeelaar! that the statement “after years of supporting Crossrail…” on the facts as known to your organisation should have been [and could have been] “after years of lying to the community” or ‘misrepresenting the facts to the community generally and to the campaigners in the area against the CrossRail hole plan which Michael Keith himself had been pushing fro and is still pushing for [even after the U-turn announced by Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006]….” ?


Kind regards

Muhammad Haque
Khoodeelaaronline
1025 Hrs GMT
5 April 2006


Dear Muhammad,
I’ve looked at the sentence in question now. I think your formulation is better and more accurate
Best Wishes
Rob [Hoveman]


From the previous edition today Wednesday 5 April 2006



Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole campaign publication schedule and arrangement at Updated 1430 Hrs GMT / 1530 Hrs UK time Wednesday 5 April 2006 is as follows


These items are scheduled to appear between 0900 Hrs GMT and 2359 Hrs GMT today Wednesday 5 April 2006. They may be postponed if breaking campaign news, priorities and events warrant such course of action. We may also add other items to this list again based on the demands of our ongoing campaign to have the reminder of the CrossRail hole plan scrapped very soon.



[The items can be viewed immediately below this] Khoodeelaar manifesto 2006 Commentary
Filed from London at 1334 Hrs GMT
Wednesday 5 April 2006

How open has been the shamelessness of Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling clique brazenly using the word ‘campaign’ to relate to their corrupt and anti-social CrossRail-hole-pushing role!

How they did that is no mystery. They are shameless and are using their lack of shame and honour because they can operate like a corrupt little cabal and a poisonous 'banana republic dictatorship', use the public cash to buy coverage in ‘ethnicity-linked’ ‘press’ and even do the same to buy the services of the ‘East London Idiotiser’.

That is why the ‘ethnicity-linked’ ‘news and media’ ‘outlets’ and the ‘East London Advertiser' [=Idiotiser]’ have failed to report that the U-turn by Alistair Darling on the CrossRail dirty hole in the Brick Lane London E1 Area has yet to be completed by Darling and his political entourage scrapping the rest of the Crossrail hole plan against the Brick Lane London E1 area.

Right from the word go, Khoodeelaar! Campaign organiser Muhammad Haque has maintained that the Ken Livingstone stunt staged in concert with Darling, Blair et al on Friday 24 March 2006 was prompted by our two-pronged attack on the perpetrators.

They would not welcome the chance to be constitutionally examined by Khoodeelaar! in court.

And they would not really feel happy with the prospect of being kicked out of the controlling [real or fake, actual or token, surrogate or autocratic] positions on Tower Hamlets Council, come 4 May 2006! Or any comparable test of that description.


Now the liars have shown their true propensities and they have sung in inelegant tunes that there was - and that THEIRS was - a ‘victory’ and they even got busy the past 11 days looking for accolades and garlands to place around each other’s necks!


Some of the most pathetic liars have resurfaced after spending 20 years down the sleazy gutters of selfishness and neglecting the community around the Brick Lane London E1 area and they have shamelessly joined the parades of predictably parasitic self-promotion flaunted under the image and the ‘facilities’ of the Tower Hamlets Council coffers controlled by Michael Keith.

They have said that they had [1] campaigned against the CrossRail hole and that they [2] had even written to the London mayor who then gave in to ‘their’ letters!

Some of Michael Keith’s ‘ethnicity-linked’ ‘mates’ [!!] have let it be known that it was they who had pulled off the about turn!


What Khoodeelaar! will be doing will be to publicly demand that they publish the evidence of what it is that they have said and the list of those they have written to and what it is that they have demanded.

Failing the production of evidence, we shall consider legal actions against every single maker of the new set of fake claims.

It looks as if we are in for our own little news conference 'emergency' that will have to be held so soon after local MP George Galloway’s version staged in [the vicinity of ] the UK House of Commons or thereabouts on Tuesday 4 April 2006.

Galloway was outing the fake Sheikh that had tried to OUT George as a neatly formatted anti-Semite and such !

But typically, our ‘local MP’ smelt a rat. Not for the first time.

And the likelihood is that if the one he snared is as deadly and contains such poison as the MP has declared then urgent remedial steps are overdue.

Just like the stinking Crossrail sewer that we have just about managed to put a stop to after fighting for 27 months to defend the community against that stench of a Michael Keith Crossrail-hole-degenerate assault on the Brick Lane London E1 area… !

[To be continued]




From the previous [the 2nd] edition [of the day] Khoodeelaardotcom
Wednesday 5 April 2006

/>
1. How Tony Blair is busy capitalising on the Crossrail hole project – and why he is wrong again to plug the crassly conceived Crossrail plan at all
2. Why is Rupert Murdoch abusing the News International/Corporation [UK/USA/Australia....] and piling on the lies against the East End – a comment on the Bethnal Green and Bow Constituency MP and the latest diversionary media ploys to suppress the campaign against the CrossRail hole
3. Why Tower Hamlets Council ‘chief executive Christine Gilbert’ will have to disclose the full facts on her role in plugging for Crossrail hole plan and why the controlling clique’s lies will haunt them far beyond the scheduled 4 May Council elections
4. Why should the Tower Hamlets Liberal Democrats have sorted out their politics before publishing the leaflets that are in contradiction between Wards. Yesterday we published the Khoodeelaar Manifesto 2006 commentary and examined page 1 of the two page Liberal Democrat leaflet for ‘Spitalfields and Banglatown’. Today, we focus on that Party’s ‘leaflet’ as found somewhere in the ‘Bethnal Green South’ Ward.





First published on this khoodeelaardotom web site
At 1230 Hrs GMT / 1330 Hrs UK time Wednesday 5 April 2006
Khoodeelaaronline has been reporting on the inanities and the idiocies [amongst other corrupt propensities and inclinations] that govern the ‘editorial’ policies and priorities of the Alan 'Rubbisher' Rusbridger Guardian as far as their conduct concerns the doings and undoings of the CrossRail hole plotters and pushers.

The Guardian has been typically dishonestly edited over the past nearly 10 years and has concealed the political and social movements taking place in the country as direct responses to the assaults being mounted on communities across the K by the Blairing regime.

The Guardian has been lying for the Blair Crassrail hole plot consistently.

The only exceptions have been when there have been the 'Guardian'-pliant misleading token-heads 'now living in the Brick Lane area', the guardian has occasionally conceded the routine ‘dissenting’ spot to a local ‘resident’ or two.

Overall, the Guardian has been slavishly pro-CrossRail. The Brick Lane area Crossrail hole and all.

This Khoodeelaaronline analysis and update on the Guardian’s role is unique and exclusive.

As part of the campaign strategy and activities, the khoodeelaar! in 2004 first exposed the then idiocies of the Guardian, almost two years ago now, in our print edition concerned in July 2004 shortly after the Guardian’s ethnicity-linked promotion of the Crossrail hole plan contained the relevant misleading and prejudiced pro-crossrail plugs for the then ‘leader’ of tower hamlets council, helal abbas [who is seeking re-election from the brick lane area at the scheduled 4 may 2006 council elections].

In the guardian’s typically stupid and prejudiced ‘key battlegrounds’ report published on Tuesday 4 April 2006, the publication manages to leave the space for the number of Blairing councillors [on Tower Hamlets Council] blank as well as introducing or maintaining its liberal spelling of the word councillor with one ‘l’.

Perhaps the Guardian is being inventive [!] there.

May be they have in fact started to believe us in the East End of London where we have been saying for ages that Tower Hamlets Council is now controlled by a lying clique.

Perhaps because of their late realisation of the truth of our representation against the CrossRail-hole-plugging clique in control of Tower Hamlets Council, the Guardian have saved one ‘l’ for reporting the lies perpetrated against the community by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council!!

Any optimism around that sort of a report appearing in the Guardian– print or online – is dashed quickly by the contents of the Guardian pre-poll ‘survey’.

They do recognise the electoral significance of the Council housing stock transfer but do not have a single word to say about CrossRail hole attacks plan on the community.

And the Guardian typically performs its own lying part for the Blairing lying clique on Tower Hamlets Council.

Whereas even the BBC was forced to recognise [belatedly] the very unprecedented political force created by the Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole attack on the community, forcing Blair to withdraw the dirty parts of the hole assault, the poisonous lying Guardian continues to pretend that our community has not achieved that political U-turn by the Blair regime and by its lying local controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAARonline London UK Wednesday 5 April 2006 Quote the typically ignorant Guardian [Helene Mulholland, Tuesday 4 April 2006] allegedly reporting on the scheduled 4 May 2006 Council election and referring to the ‘significant’ political issue at the poll
“Special report: elections
Analysis

The key battlegrounds
This year's local elections are a challenge to all three party leaders. Hélène Mulholland takes a look at some of the key boroughs
Hélène Mulholland Tuesday April 4, 2006
…. Tower Hamlets: Con 1, Lab 31, Lib Dem 16, Ind 2, Respect 1
This flagship Labour-controlled London borough faces a concerted challenge from the Respect party, where Respect member George Galloway is the local constituency MP. Respect is fielding a candidate for every seat where it has made a significant noise about the stock transfer of council housing in an area where many estates face ballots to hand over their council property into housing association hands. Unrealistic ambitions to take control of the council, where Respect currently has just one councilor, may be wide of the mark, but the party could eat in the Labour majority and return the council to no over all control. Labour only has a majority of, trailed by the Lib Dems (16). Labour watchers are praying that the local MP's questionable appearance on Big Brother earlier this year may undo much of the electoral damage they previously feared.”
KHOODEELAARonline London UK Wednesday 5 April 2006 unQuote the typically ignorant Guardian [Helene Mulholland, Tuesday 4 April 2006] allegedly reporting on the scheduled 4 May 2006 Council election and referring to the ‘significant’ political issue at the poll



CBRUK - KHOODEELAAR!

http://www.khoodeelaar.com

KHOODEELAAR!
The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole-tunnel ‘project, scheme, plan’ Bill [that is ‘the Crossrail Bill’ in the UK House of Commons – in March 2006]

LEGAL DISCLAIMER 0830 Hrs GMT / 0930 Hrs UK time Wednesday 5 April 2006
The contents published on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site are written, authored and created by the Editor and they belong to the Editor unless otherwise stated in relation to individual items published here. The name Khoodeelaar is the intellectual property of the Editor and Author. All materials are published here purely and solely for educational purposes. That is, NO part of the items published or cited as original trailers here on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site must be used for commercial, immoral, illegal or party political or sectarian or propaganda purposes or for any purposes that are anathema to the universally accepted and recognised codes of ethics and morality. Intellectual property rights action shall be taken to protect the integrity of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole attacks plan scheme project Bill [UK House of Commons at the date of this disclaimer] and their contractors, touts and agencies. NO part of the contents of the Khoodeelaardotcom web site must be included in any promotion of the interests against whose continuation and existence the Khoodeelaardotcom web site is created authored written and published. That means that none of these materials must be used to show Crossrail programme in any positive light as to do so would contradict the aims and objects of the contents of this web site. And that would amount to illegal and immoral distortion of the contents of this Khoodeelaardotcom web site.